Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of hypotheses testing

From: Improving farm productivity through the reduction of managerial and technology gaps among farmers in Rwanda

Null hypothesis

LR statistic (λ)

Degree of freedom

p value

Critical value (χ2, 0.05)

Decision

1. \({\mathrm{H}}_{0}:\gamma =0\)

 Local varieties

6.90

1

0.007

3.84

Reject H0

 OPVs

9.32

1

0.000

3.84

Reject H0

 Hybrids

8.65

1

0.002

3.84

Reject H0

 Pooled sample

10.62

1

0.001

3.84

Reject H0

2. \({\mathrm{H}}_{0}:{\delta }_{1}={\delta }_{2}=\dots ={\delta }_{10}=0\)

 Local varieties

29.07

10

0.014

18.30

Reject H0

 OPVs

30.30

10

0.001

18.30

Reject H0

 Hybrids

28.66

10

0.022

18.30

Reject H0

 Pooled sample

49.31

10

0.000

18.30

Reject H0

3. \({\mathrm{H}}_{0}:{\beta }_{ik}=0\)

 Local varieties

5.95

10

0.306

18.30

Do not reject H0

 OPVs

6.16

10

0.143

18.30

Do not reject H0

 Hybrids

6.02

10

0.250

18.30

Do not reject H0

 Pooled sample

6.21

10

0.515

18.30

Do not reject H0

4. All individual groups share the same technology

61.34

37

0.008

55.75

Reject H0

 Eta (\(\eta \)) endogeneity test—\(\left({\chi }^{2}=7.12\right)\)a; p = 0.214

  1. a\({\mathrm{H}}_{0}\): No endogeneity in the model, decision: do not reject H0