Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Considerable decreased fruits and snack consumption in Iran population during COVID-19 lockdown: a cross-sectional web-based survey National Food and Nutrition Surveillance

Agriculture & Food Security volume 12, Article number: 21 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Inadequate fruits and vegetables intake is associated with several diseases. This study aimed to explore changes in fruits and snack consumption during the COVID-19-related lockdown in Iran.

Methods

An online cross-sectional survey among Iranian households was conducted from the 4th to 25th April 2020, during the COVID-19 lockdown. Data were collected about any changes in frequency consumption of the fruits and snacks and the reasons for the changes. Ordinal logistic regression was performed to examine which factors contributed to changes in consumption. To account for the complex sampling design and allow inferences valid for the population, sampling weights were used in all analyses.

Results

A total of 21,290 households took part in the survey. During the epidemic, consumption of fruits and snacks decreased by 35% and 44%, respectively. Among the households whose fruit intake was decreased, about 21% fully omitted it from their food baskets. Residing in rural areas, having more than six members in the household, income loss, and residing in deprived provinces were directly associated with decreased consumption of fruits and snacks. Being a female-headed household was positively associated, and having persons with COVID-19 in the households was inversely associated, with decreased consumption of fruits. The main reason for reducing fruit and snack consumption was income loss.

Conclusions

A significant decline in fruit and snack consumption because of COVID-19 lockdown was seen among the Iranian households. It is likely that these changes in dietary habits will become longstanding with consequent adverse health outcomes.

Introduction

The newly emerged infectious disease, COVID-19, spread inexorably worldwide, leading to the World Health Organization (WHO) declaring it a pandemic [1]. Under such circumstances, all countries, including Iran, established lockdown measures to slow the expansion of the outbreak. In Iran, the first case of COVID-19 was documented on 19th of February and a lockdown was imposed on 7th of March, 2020 [2]. Thus, from the 7th of March, 2020, millions of Iranians were instructed to stay at home.

The lockdown, globally, has brought about some positive and negative impacts. For example, lessening the magnitude of the first epidemic wave and improving air quality have been mentioned as positive impacts [3, 4]. However, some negative consequences, such as an increase in unemployment and income loss, increase in loneliness and unhappiness, psycho-social consequences due to increasing marital discord, and domestic violence have been attributed to the lockdown [5,6,7,8,9].

Maintaining a healthy dietary habit, especially amid the pandemic, is crucial to boosting the immune system. From a nutritional point of view, remaining at home for a long time may lead to alterations in dietary habits, lifestyles, and food security among people [10,11,12]. Although the lockdown may result in having more time for cooking and a decrease in fast-food consumption, [13, 14] remaining at home and the disturbance to the daily routine may cause boredom [15]. In addition, a negative mood caused by the COVID-19 can lead to “food craving” [16], which in turn, can deleteriously impact healthy eating. Furthermore, limited shopping opportunities may reduce the intake of fresh foods, namely, fruits and vegetables, at the expense of junk foods and snacks, which are typically high in sugar, fat, and salt [17].

Fruits are very good sources of natural antioxidants and phytochemicals with immunomodulatory effects [18]. It has been estimated that about 3.0% (~ 1.7 million) of deaths globally, some 11% of ischemic heart disease deaths, nearly 14% of gastrointestinal deaths and 9% of stroke deaths are attributed to inadequate fruits and vegetables intake [19, 20]. Adequate consumption of fruits and vegetables has, therefore, been recommended as a protective strategy against several human pathologies including severe forms of COVID-19 in the subjects with underlying diseases [21]. Nevertheless, changes of consumption pattern during COVID-19 lockdown have been quite different in various communities. Though some reports indicate decreased intake of fruits, some others show unchanged or even increased consumption [22,23,24,25]. According to the Iran's Statistical Center reports, purchase (as a proxy of consumption) of vegetables in the Iranian households has had little changes over the last decade while that of fruits shows a decline especially since 2019 [26]. Understanding how the pandemic could alter food consumption patterns will help public health authorities in tailoring interventions to fulfill the population's needs. To address the above issues, the present cross-sectional descriptive–analytical study was conducted using a web-based electronic self-administered questionnaire to explore changes in the intake of fruits and snacks during the nationwide COVID-19-related lockdown in Iran.

Methods

Setting and study design

The data were derived from a descriptive–analytical cross-sectional study conducted in 21,290 Iranian households that participated in an online survey [27]. The anonymous questionnaire was administered from 4 to 25th April 2020, during which Iran was in a coronavirus epidemic lockdown, via the following weblink (https://panel.rabit.ir/s/c1NEPPXL483.html). The questionnaire comprised close-ended questions to explore changes in usual dietary intake in a semi-quantitative manner. The survey link was circulated through social media (e.g., WhatsApp, Instagram) and the website of the Deputy Minister of Research and Technology of the Ir. Ministry of Health (corona.research.ac.ir). The vice-chancellors for health affairs and the community nutrition offices of the medical universities in all provinces received a formal letter from the Ministry of Health's Community Nutrition Department. The objectives of the survey were explained in this letter, and they were asked to inform the community members covered by their services about the link via provincial health and nutrition professionals. We also adopted the snowball-sampling technique to ensure a large-scale distribution and recruitment. participants were asked to roll out the online questionnaire to their acquaintances and relatives to reach as many respondents as possible.

Data collection

The anonymous online questionnaire consisted of questions about socio-demographic characteristics, any changes in frequency consumption of the selected food items, and the reasons for changing the frequency consumption during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Content validity and face validity of the questionnaire were evaluated by both experienced researchers in the field of nutrition and a non-expert group to ensure the simplicity and clarity of the questions, and modifications were introduced following the pilot study. Details on the development of the questionnaire have been presented elsewhere [27].

Assessment of other variables

This section included data regarding gender (male, female), education level (master/higher, bachelor, associate, diploma, elementary), and occupation of the households’ heads (employee, self-employed, retired, health workers, teacher, driver, other), household size, provincial regions (urban/rural), presence of a high-risk person in the household (none, under-5 children, pregnant or lactating women, elderly), and any changes in household income (no changes, low decrease, half, cut), during the coronavirus epidemic. The presence of a person with a history of COVID-19 within the household (no, yes) and the security status of the province (secure, semi-secure, insecure) was also asked. The categorization of the provinces based on food security status was performed based on a national report [28].

Fruits and snack intake during the COVID-19 lockdown

The participants reported changes in the consumption frequency of fruits, salty, and sweet snacks during the COVID-19 lockdown compared with the pre-COVID-19 period. Options of the changes included “decreased,” “unchanged,” and “increased.” In addition, the reasons for decreasing or increasing consumption were also included [27].

Statistical analyses

Descriptive analysis (i.e., mean, standard deviation, percentage) was conducted to assess the distribution of socio-demographic status among the respondents.

Ordinal logistic regression was conducted to examine which factors contributed to changes in the selected food items. A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered significant. Two outcomes of fruit consumption changes per week (more vs. no changes vs. less) and decreases in fruit consumption (little decrease vs. half vs. omitted) were considered as dependent variables in the regression models, after confirmation that the overall parallel assumption had not been violated (p = 0.515 and p = 0.133, respectively).

The gender, education level, and occupation of the head of the household, household size, provincial regions, and the presence of a high-risk person in the household, any changes in household income during the coronavirus epidemic, the presence of a person with a history of COVID-19 within the household, and security status of the province were assessed as the independent variables.

To account for the complex sampling design and allow inferences valid for the population, sampling weights were used in all analyses. Stata version 16.0 (StataCorp LLC) was used for analyzing the data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

At the beginning of the survey, all participants were informed about the study's objectives and context and gave their digital informed consent regarding privacy and information management policies. Furthermore, there was no compensation to participate. The study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki [29]. The Ethics Committee approved all procedures involving research study participants of the National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute (IR.SBMU.NNFTRI.REC.1399.066).

Results

A total of 21,290 households participated in the survey. Accordingly, about 90% of the household heads were men and the majority (74%) of the respondents resided in rural areas. The mean age of household heads was 44.7y (44.2–44.9, 95% CI). The data indicated that almost 43% of the respondents had an academic degree, 33% were under diploma, and 24% had a diploma. Households with 3–5 members were dominant (78%); however, households with 1–2 and > 6 members comprised 16% and 6% of the households, respectively. The majority (54%) of the households had no high-risk members, while the weighted percentages of high-risk members, including those under 5 years, pregnant/nursing women, and elderly, were 23%, 3%, and 10%, respectively. Ten percent of the households had more than one high-risk member.

The majority (34.3%) of the household heads were self-employed, whereas employees, retirees, drivers, teachers, and health workers comprised 20.5%, 11.7%, 3.9%, 3.1%, and 2.7% of the occupations, respectively, and 23.8% of the household heads had other jobs (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Certain characteristics of the studied population

Full size image

As demonstrated in Table 1, the consumption of fruits and snacks during COVID-19 lockdown changed among most of the participants. Consumption frequency of fruits and snacks decreased among 35% and 44% of the households, respectively. On the other hand, fruit and snack consumption among 45% and 43% of the households stayed the same as before, respectively. Of the households who reported decreased fruit intake, approximately 21% entirely omitted it.

Table 1 Changes in consumption of fruit and snacks in household per week after COVID-19 epidemic
Full size table

Table 2 shows that residing in rural areas (OR = 1.23, 95%CI 1.13, 1.34, p < 0.001), having more than six household members (OR = 1.18, 95%CI 1.01, 1.37, p = 0.032), decreasing income (Low decrease: OR = 2.08, 95%CI 1.88, 2.28, p < 0.001; Half: OR = 2.52, 95%CI 2.26, 2.82, p < 0.001; Cut: OR = 5.38, 95%CI 4.74, 6.11,,p < 0.001), and residing in food insecure provinces (Semi secure: OR = 1.12, 95%CI 1.01, 1.23, p = 0.019; Insecure: OR = 1.98, 95%CI 1.77, 2.20, p < 0.001) were positively associated with decreased consumption of fruits and snacks. Lower education and having high-risk family members were inversely associated with consumption frequency of fruits and snacks. However, the association between having children under 5 years and decreased consumption of snacks was not significant. Being a female household head was inversely and having persons with COVID-19 in the households was directly associated with the consumption frequency of fruits (OR = 1.16, 95%CI 1.02, 1.32, p = 0.023, and OR = 0.78, 95%CI 0.63, 0.96, p = 0.021, respectively).

Table 2 Ordered logistic regression models of changes in intake of fruits and snacks during the COVID-19 lockdown
Full size table

The consumption frequency of fruits and snacks was also directly associated with the occupation of health workers.

Among those households who reduced their fruit intake, 21% had eliminated it entirely (Fig. 2). In comparison, about half of the participants had cut it in half, and 30% had reduced it slightly.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The amount of decrease in fruits consumption in the studied households (%) during lockdown period among those households who reported decreased fruits consumption

Full size image

As shown in Table 3, residing in rural areas (OR = 1.16, 95%CI 0.82, 1.26, P = 0.033), having more than six members in the household (OR = 1.30, 95%CI 1.02, 1.64, P = 0.030), decrease in income (Half: OR = 1.63, 95%CI 1.34, 1.97, p < 0.001; Cut: OR = 2.95, 95%CI 2.40, 3.63, p < 0.001), and residing in food insecure provinces (Semi secure: OR = 1.28, 95%CI 1.08, 1.52, p = 0.004; Insecure: OR = 1.72, 95%CI 1.43, 2.07, p < 0.001) were inversely associated with consumption frequency of fruits among those who had a decline in fruit consumption. Furthermore, lower education level was also inversely associated with consumption of fruits.

Table 3 Ordered logistic regression models of decrease in fruit consumption among households whose fruit intake was decreased during COVID-19 lockdown
Full size table

The main reason for reducing fruit and snack consumption during COVID-19 lockdown was income decrease, while fear of contamination was ranked as the second reason for reducing fruit and snack consumption (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Reasons for decrease in fruit and snack consumption during COVID-19 lockdown

Full size image

The prominent reason for increasing fruit consumption during the COVID-19 lockdown was boosting the immune system. On the other hand, a greater tendency and increasing free time were the most frequent reasons for snack consumption.

Discussion

Our study has detailed the first overview of Iranian households' fruit and snack intake during the COVID-19 lockdown, which is critical for developing strategies to improve diet quality and food security during times of crisis.

According to the current study, the lockdown had a significant impact on reducing fruit and snack consumption. Among the households whose fruit intake was decreased, about 21% entirely omitted it, while about half of the participants had cut it in half. The current results align with the studies conducted in UK and the state of Michigan that reported people had reduced fruit intake levels during the COVID-19 lockdown [30, 31].

Under the pandemic scenario, management of overweight or obesity is even more challenging; indeed, it is pivotal for individuals to adhere to risk management strategies that should also include a well-balanced diet including sufficient intake of fruits and vegetables [32].

On the other hand, decreased fruit intake may lead to a weakened immune system due to accumulating evidence of the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of their components including vitamin C, carotenoids, B vitamins, and polyphenols, such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, stilbenes, and lignans [33,34,35]. Though the consumption of dietary supplements may have increased as an attempt to compensate for the resulting decreased micronutrient intake [36], recent evidence suggests that needy households commonly have less access to dietary supplements [37].

Residing in rural areas, having over six household members, decreasing income, and residing in deprived provinces were positively associated with reduced consumption of fruits and snacks. The main reason for reducing fruit and snack consumption during the COVID-19 lockdown was a reduction in family income. In line with our findings, some studies have demonstrated that fruits and vegetables are among the first items to be sacrificed [38,39,40,41]. Harris et al., in a study in India, found that 62% of households changed their diets (especially to the detriment of healthy foods) since the outbreak of COVID-19, and approximately 50% reported falls in consumption of fruits [42]. In a systematic review of 35 primary studies, it was found that the impact of the pandemic has been particularly adverse on households with low socio-economic status and those living in rural and deprived areas [43].

It is worth noting that there were extensive job losses and income decrements in the world, including Iran, due to COVID-19, [11] and food-insecure households are much more likely to be sensitive to these changes in household income and employment status [44]. Indeed, some studies showed that the COVID-19 pandemic had changed the eating behaviors of food-insecure households, where such changes may be attributed to higher stress levels, fewer resources, and less access to food, leading to restrictions on food quantity and quality, including fruits and vegetables [45]. On the other hand, fluctuations in prices and availability that are usually seen during natural disasters have occurred as a result of the pandemic [46]. Therefore, fruit and vegetable demand are very inconsistent, and COVID-19 is likely to increase fruit and vegetable prices [47], both as a cause and consequence of food shortages.

Fear of contamination was ranked as the second reason for the reduction in fruit and snack consumption. This finding is consistent with those reported by Pakravan-Charvadeh et al. [11] and Kaya et al., [48] in Iran and Turkey who found that fruits and vegetables consumption had reduced among people due to the fear of virus contamination from the surfaces.

The prominent reason for increasing fruit consumption during the COVID-19 lockdown was boosting the immune system; which may be attributed to the observation that COVID-19 has made people more conscious of the amount of immune-boosting foods in their diet [49].

A greater tendency and increasing free time were the most frequent reasons reported for snack consumption. Empirical evidence suggests that increasing free time is an incentive for increased snacking [50].

Moreover, we revealed that during the COVID-19 pandemic, female-headed households were likely to reduce their intake of fruits more than male-headed households. In accord to our results, studies conducted in Ethiopia and India have also shown that poorer and female-headed households have some of the lowest levels of dietary diversity and food security indices. [51] Nevertheless, in our investigation, the causes of these alterations were mostly related to cultural and financial poverty resulting in skipping healthy foods [43, 52].

Based on the present study, having high-risk household members was positively associated with decreased consumption of fruits and snacks. Thus, the pandemic may affect people’s nutrition quality and quantity, particularly among the at-risk population [53]. Though epidemic lockdown-induced changes in dietary habits may be temporary in other communities, the concomitance of the epidemic with accelerated inflation in Iran may make these changes longstanding [14]. The importance of this issue lies in the fact that the pre-epidemic per capita consumption of fruits and vegetables were 160 and 248 g/d, respectively [26] which were already less than the recommended daily intake for health promotion [54]. While the amount of vegetable consumption showed a little change 2 years after the epidemic (~ 237 g/d), that of fruits decreased further (~ 139 g/d) [26]. Therefore, these dietary changes can adversely affect general health and potentially increase the susceptibility of the population to several diseases [55, 56].

This was the first nationwide study on changes in dietary habits of Iranian households during the COVID-19 epidemic. Nevertheless, some limitations regarding the present survey should be noted. First, the study participants were chosen randomly and recruited voluntarily via snowball sampling, which may have introduced some bias into the recruited sample. Second, since the questionnaire was self-administrated, only people motivated by an interest in the topic might have participated in the survey. In addition, online surveys tend to exclude those people who are not web-illiterate, as well as older people. The above-listed limitations are common in online surveys, which are currently very common [30, 57, 58]. Nevertheless, these types of surveys are preferred over face-to-face interviews due to offering the possibility of gathering data from a distance during the COVID-19 pandemic [59, 60]. Notwithstanding, correspondence of the mean household size and the ratio of urban to rural households with the latest report of population census in Iran [61] indicates that the study population was representative of the whole country households. Another important limitation of this study is that it failed to define the type of snacks as healthy or unhealthy foods.

Conclusion

A significant decline in fruit and snack consumption because of COVID-19 lockdown was seen among Iranian households. Several factors including lower education, female-headed households, having high-risk family members, decrease in income, crowded households, residing in rural areas, and food insecure provinces, were associated with unhealthy changes of uneating behavior. Nevertheless, the main reasons were income decrease and fear of contamination showing the importance of food assistance and public health messaging about healthy eating more than ever. The present findings will help officials and policymakers to develop and implement regulations for similar situations.

Implications for policy making and interventions

  • We found a remarkable decrease in fruits and snacks consumption among Iranian households during epidemic lockdown. Those households who were female-headed, resided in rural areas, low-income and more crowded tended to have more decrement in consumption frequency of fruits.

  • Inadequate fruits consumption can bring about serious health consequences.

  • Considering the economic conditions of Iran, it is plausible that these chances in dietary habits become long-lasting.

  • Policy-making and strategies must be toward supportive interventions, including supplementation, home fortification and food baskets for needy households.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets generated and/or analyzed during this study are not publicly available because of the use of data for further publications but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease of 2019

NNFTRI:

National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Bio Medica: Atenei Parmensis. 2020;91(1):157.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmadi A, Fadaei Y, Shirani M, Rahmani F. Modeling and forecasting trend of COVID-19 epidemic in Iran until May 13, 2020. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020;34:27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Roques L, Klein EK, Papaix J, Sar A, Soubeyrand S. Impact of lockdown on the epidemic dynamics of COVID-19 in France. Front Med. 2020;7:274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Isaifan R. The dramatic impact of Coronavirus outbreak on air quality: has it saved as much as it has killed so far? Glob J Environ Sci Manag. 2020;6(3):275–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fletcher M, Prickett KC, Chapple S. Immediate employment and income impacts of Covid-19 in New Zealand: evidence from a survey conducted during the Alert Level 4 lockdown. New Zealand Econ Pap. 2022;56(1):73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kandoussi M, Langot F. The Lockdown Impact on Unemployment for Heterogeneous Workers. 2020. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/223881/1/dp13439.pdf

  7. Brodeur A, Clark AE, Fleche S, Powdthavee N. Assessing the impact of the coronavirus lockdown on unhappiness, loneliness, and boredom using Google Trends. 2020. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2004/2004.12129.pdf.

  8. Ahrens KF, Neumann RJ, Kollmann B, Plichta MM, Lieb K, Tüscher O, et al. Differential impact of COVID-related lockdown on mental health in Germany. World Psychiatry. 2021;20(1):140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Das M, Das A, Mandal A. Examining the impact of lockdown (due to COVID-19) on Domestic Violence (DV): an evidences from India. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;54: 102335.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mumena WA. Impact of COVID-19 curfew on eating habits, food Intake, and weight according to food security status in Saudi Arabia: a retrospective study. Progress Nutr. 2020;22: e2020075.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pakravan-Charvadeh MR, Mohammadi-Nasrabadi F, Gholamrezai S, Vatanparast H, Flora C, Nabavi-Pelesaraei A. The short-term effects of COVID-19 outbreak on dietary diversity and food security status of Iranian households (A case study in Tehran province). J Clean Prod. 2021;281: 124537.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lamarche B, Brassard D, Lapointe A, Laramée C, Kearney M, Côté M, et al. Changes in diet quality and food security among adults during the COVID-19–related early lockdown: results from NutriQuébec. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa363.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bennett G, Young E, Butler I, Coe S. The impact of lockdown during the COVID-19 Outbreak on dietary habits in various population groups: a scoping review. Front Nutrition. 2021. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fnut.2021.626432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahmoudinia D. The Asymmetric Effects of Monetary Policy, Currency Crises and Oil Price on Food Inflation in Iran: an Application of Quantile Regression. Macroecon Finance Emerg Market Econ. 2021;5:1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moynihan AB, Van Tilburg WA, Igou ER, Wisman A, Donnelly AE, Mulcaire JB. Eaten up by boredom: consuming food to escape awareness of the bored self. Front Psychol. 2015;6:369.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodríguez-Martín BC, Meule A. Food craving: new contributions on its assessment, moderators, and consequences. Front Psychol. 2015;6:21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Di Renzo L, Gualtieri P, Pivari F, Soldati L, Attinà A, Cinelli G, et al. Eating habits and lifestyle changes during COVID-19 lockdown: an Italian survey. J Transl Med. 2020;18:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Malta DC, Szwarcwald CL, Barros MBdA, Gomes CS, Machado ÍE, Souza Júnior PRBd, et al. The COVID-19 Pandemic and changes in adult Brazilian lifestyles: a cross-sectional study, 2020. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. 2020;29. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1590/S1679-49742020000400026.

  19. Agudo A, Joint F. Measuring intake of fruit and vegetables [electronic resource]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization (WHO) and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Fruit and Vegetables for Health. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Workshop Kobe, Japan1–3 September 2004. Geneva: WHO; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rezaeipandari H. Barriers to fish consumption and it’s influencing factors: a comprehensive overview of the relevant evidence in Iran and in the world. Journal of Health in the Field. 2014;2(1):46–60.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rabiei S, Ghodsi D, Amini M, Nikooyeh B, Rasekhi H, Doustmohammadian A, et al. Changes in fast food intake in Iranian households during the lockdown period caused by COVID-19 virus emergency, National Food and Nutrition Surveillance. Food Sci Nutr. 2022;10(1):39–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nikooyeh B, Rabiei S, Amini M, Ghodsi D, Rasekhi H, Doustmohammadian A, et al. COVID-19 epidemic lockdown-induced changes of cereals and animal protein foods consumption of Iran population: the first nationwide survey. J Health Popul Nutr. 2022;41(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Janssen M, Chang BPI, Hristov H, Pravst I, Profeta A, Millard J. Changes in Food Consumption During the COVID-19 Pandemic: analysis of consumer survey data from the first lockdown period in Denmark, Germany, and Slovenia. Front Nutr. 2021. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fnut.2021.635859.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tian X, Zhou Y, Wang H. The impact of COVID-19 on food consumption and dietary quality of rural households in China. Foods. 2022;11(4):510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Statistical Center of Iran Household, Expenditure and Income. https://www.amar.org.ir/english/Metadata/Statistical-Survey/Household-Expenditure-and-Income. Access date Apr 4 2022.

  27. Rasekhi H, Rabiei S, Amini M, Ghodsi D, Doustmohammadian A, Nikooyeh B, et al. COVID-19 epidemic-induced changes of dietary intake of iran population during lockdown period: the study protocol National Food and Nutrition Surveillance. Nutr Food Sci Res. 2021;8(2):1–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kolahdooz F, Najafi F. Report of a National Survey: Food security information and mapping system in Iran [Persian]. Tehran: Iran Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Headey DD, Ruel MT. The COVID-19 nutrition crisis: What to expect and how to protect. IFPRI book chapters. 2020; pp 38–41. https://ideas.repec.org/h/fpr/ifpric/133843.html

  30. Litton MM, Beavers AW. The relationship between food security status and fruit and vegetable intake during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nutrients. 2021;13(3):712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Naughton F, Ward E, Khondoker M, Belderson P, Marie Minihane A, Dainty J, et al. Health behaviour change during the UK COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from the first wave of the C-19 health behaviour and well-being daily tracker study. Br J Health Psychol. 2021;26(2):624–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Gasmi A, Noor S, Tippairote T, Dadar M, Menzel A, Bjørklund G. Individual risk management strategy and potential therapeutic options for the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Immunol. 2020;215: 108409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Duthie SJ, Duthie GG, Russell WR, Kyle JA, Macdiarmid JI, Rungapamestry V, et al. Effect of increasing fruit and vegetable intake by dietary intervention on nutritional biomarkers and attitudes to dietary change: a randomised trial. Eur J Nutr. 2018;57(5):1855–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Poniedziałek B, Rzymski P, Pięt M, Gąsecka M, Stroińska A, Niedzielski P, et al. Relation between polyphenols, malondialdehyde, antioxidant capacity, lactate dehydrogenase and toxic elements in human colostrum milk. Chemosphere. 2018;191:548–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bacchetti T, Turco I, Urbano A, Morresi C, Ferretti G. Relationship of fruit and vegetable intake to dietary antioxidant capacity and markers of oxidative stress: a sex-related study. Nutrition. 2019;61:164–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. de Faria C-R, Corgosinho FC, Sanches FLFZ, Prado CMM, Laviano A, Mota JF. Dietary recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nutr Rev. 2020;79(4):382–93.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ghodsi D, Nikooyeh B, Amini M, Rabiei S, Doustmohammadian A, Abdollahi Z, et al. Dietary supplements use among Iranian households during COVID-19 epidemic lockdown: Less access in those who may need more. National Food and Nutrition Surveillance. Int J Prev Med. 2023:[in press].

  38. Muhammad A, D’Souza A, Meade B, Micha R, Mozaffarian D. The influence of income and prices on global dietary patterns by country, age, and gender. 2017. No. 1477-2017-581.

  39. Bonaccio M, Bonanni AE, Di Castelnuovo A, De Lucia F, Donati MB, De Gaetano G, et al. Low income is associated with poor adherence to a Mediterranean diet and a higher prevalence of obesity: cross-sectional results from the Moli-sani study. BMJ Open. 2012. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001685.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. French SA, Tangney CC, Crane MM, Wang Y, Appelhans BM. Nutrition quality of food purchases varies by household income: the SHoPPER study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Engler-Stringer R. Food selection and preparation practices in a group of young low-income women in Montreal. Appetite. 2011;56(1):118–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Harris J, Depenbusch L, Pal AA, Nair RM, Ramasamy S. Food system disruption: initial livelihood and dietary effects of COVID-19 on vegetable producers in India. Food security. 2020;12(4):841–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Picchioni F, Goulao LF, Roberfroid D. The impact of COVID-19 on diet quality, food security and nutrition in low and middle income countries: A systematic review of the evidence. Clin Nutr. 2022;41(12):2955–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Morales DX, Morales SA, Beltran TF. Racial/ethnic disparities in household food insecurity during the covid-19 pandemic: a nationally representative study. J Racial Ethnic Health Disparities. 2020. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s40615-020-00892-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Laborde D, Martin W, Swinnen J, Vos R. COVID-19 risks to global food security. Science. 2020;369(6503):500–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cavallo A, Cavallo E, Rigobon R. Prices and supply disruptions during natural disasters. Review of Income and Wealth. 2014;60:S449–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Reardon T, Bellemare MF, Zilberman D. How COVID-19 may disrupt food supply chains in developing countries. IFPRI book chapters. 2020:78–80.

  48. Kaya S, Uzdil Z, Cakiroğlu FP. Evaluation of the effects of fear and anxiety on nutrition during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Public Health Nutr. 2021;24(2):282–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Naja F, Hamadeh R. Nutrition amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-level framework for action. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020;74(8):1117–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Delaney M, McCarthy M. Food choice and health across the life course: a qualitative study examining food choice in older Irish adults. Journal of food products marketing. 2011;17(2–3):114–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hirvonen K, De Brauw A, Abate GT. Food consumption and food security during the COVID-19 pandemic in Addis Ababa. Am J Agr Econ. 2021;103(3):772–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Shahzad MA, Qing P, Rizwan M, Razzaq A, Faisal M. COVID-19 pandemic, determinants of food insecurity, and household mitigation measures: a case study of Punjab Pakistan. Healthcare. 2021. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare9060621.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Wolfson JA, Leung CW. Food insecurity and COVID-19: Disparities in early effects for US adults. Nutrients. 2020;12(6):1648.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu RH. Health-promoting components of fruits and vegetables in the diet. Adv Nutr. 2013;4(3):384S-S392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Slavin JL, Lloyd B. Health benefits of fruits and vegetables. Adv Nutr. 2012;3(4):506–16. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3945/an.112.002154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Jideani AI, Silungwe H, Takalani T, Omolola AO, Udeh HO, Anyasi TA. Antioxidant-rich natural fruit and vegetable products and human health. Int J Food Prop. 2021;24(1):41–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. de Melo AF, Homem-de-Mello M. High-dose intravenous vitamin C may help in cytokine storm in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Malta DC, Szwarcwald CL, Barros MBDA, Gomes CS, Machado ÍE, Souza Júnior PRBD, et al. The COVID-19 Pandemic and changes in adult Brazilian lifestyles: a cross-sectional study, 2020. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. 2020;29:e2020407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hargreaves JR, Morison LA, Gear JS, Kim JC, Makhubele MB, Porter JD, et al. Assessing household wealth in health studies in developing countries: a comparison of participatory wealth ranking and survey techniques from rural South Africa. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2007;4(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kahlon MK, Aksan N, Aubrey R, Clark N, Cowley-Morillo M, Jacobs EA, et al. Effect of layperson-delivered, empathy-focused program of telephone calls on loneliness, depression, and anxiety among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiat. 2021. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Iran Statistics Center. The concise report of the nationwide income-expense census of Iranian urban and rural households, 2018. Population, work force and census office (https://www.amar.org.ir/Portals/0/News/1398/1_ch-hvd97.pdf) [In Persian]. 2019.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all study participants for their support in data collection. We also would like to thank our colleagues in Community Nutrition Offices of the medical universities in all Iran provinces.

Funding

This study received COVID-19 research grant from Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (No. 25777).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Maryam Amini and Azam Doustmohammadian have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutrition Research, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute and Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Maryam Amini, Bahareh Nikooyeh, Samira Rabiei, Delaram Ghodsi, Hamid Rasekhi & Tirang R. Neyestani

  2. Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Azam Doustmohammadian

  3. Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry University, Coventry, CV1 5FB, UK

    Cain C. T. Clark

  4. Department of Community Nutrition, Deputy of Health, Iran Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran

    Zahra Abdollahi, Mina Minaie & Farzaneh Sadeghi Ghotbabadi

Authors
  1. Maryam Amini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Azam Doustmohammadian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bahareh Nikooyeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cain C. T. Clark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Samira Rabiei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Delaram Ghodsi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hamid Rasekhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zahra Abdollahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mina Minaie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Farzaneh Sadeghi Ghotbabadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tirang R. Neyestani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work; the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data for the work. MA and AD drafted the manuscript, TRN and CCTC revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors gave final approval of the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. MA: conceptualization (equal), investigation (equal), methodology (equal), validation (equal), writing, review and editing (equal); AD: conceptualization (equal), investigation (equal), methodology (equal); validation (equal), writing, review and editing (equal); BN: conceptualization (equal), statistical analyses, investigation (equal), methodology (equal); validation (equal); CCTC: conceptualization (equal), writing, review and editing (equal); SR: conceptualization (equal), investigation (equal); methodology (equal); validation (equal); DG: conceptualization (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); validation (equal); HR: conceptualization (equal), investigation (equal); methodology (equal); validation (equal); software (equal); ZA: conceptualization (equal), supervision (equal); validation (equal), arrangement with health deputies of the provincial medical universities; MM: conceptualization (equal); supervision (equal); validation (equal), arrangement with health deputies of the provincial medical universities;. FSG: conceptualization (equal), supervision (equal), validation (equal), arrangement with health deputies of the provincial medical universities;.. TRN: conceptualization (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); project administration (leader); supervision (main supervisor); validation (equal); writing, review and editing (equal).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tirang R. Neyestani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were approved by Ethics Committee of the National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute (IR.SBMU. NNFTRI.REC.1399.066). All participants were properly instructed and gave online their informed consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amini, M., Doustmohammadian, A., Nikooyeh, B. et al. Considerable decreased fruits and snack consumption in Iran population during COVID-19 lockdown: a cross-sectional web-based survey National Food and Nutrition Surveillance. Agric & Food Secur 12, 21 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40066-023-00427-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40066-023-00427-3

Keywords

Agriculture & Food Security

ISSN: 2048-7010